<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Computer Security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jeremyduffy.com/seminar/computer-security-module/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jeremyduffy.com</link>
	<description>Helping to protect families and their loved ones from manipulation and fraud</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:34:42 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://www.jeremyduffy.com/seminar/computer-security-module/comment-page-1#comment-9116</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 21:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeremyduffy.com/seminar/computer-security-module/#comment-9116</guid>
		<description>might want to look into http://www.malwarebytes.org/ its kinda new,but this software helped cleaned out some stuff, that adware and spybot did not. flaws would be that it takes a little longer then the other scanners, but it does work, it has other options, but you have to pay for it to get them, but not needed, cause its main use is malware.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>might want to look into <a href="http://www.malwarebytes.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.malwarebytes.org/</a> its kinda new,but this software helped cleaned out some stuff, that adware and spybot did not. flaws would be that it takes a little longer then the other scanners, but it does work, it has other options, but you have to pay for it to get them, but not needed, cause its main use is malware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.jeremyduffy.com/seminar/computer-security-module/comment-page-1#comment-5101</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeremyduffy.com/seminar/computer-security-module/#comment-5101</guid>
		<description>Jasmine: Thanks for the link. I wanted to point out that while the title of Schneier&#039;s post sounds as if it&#039;s not recommending using these tools, he actually is. As long as you&#039;re using them regularly, there&#039;s no way they can claim that you did it just to evade discovery (plausible deniability is the phrase he used).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jasmine: Thanks for the link. I wanted to point out that while the title of Schneier&#8217;s post sounds as if it&#8217;s not recommending using these tools, he actually is. As long as you&#8217;re using them regularly, there&#8217;s no way they can claim that you did it just to evade discovery (plausible deniability is the phrase he used).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jasmine</title>
		<link>http://www.jeremyduffy.com/seminar/computer-security-module/comment-page-1#comment-5085</link>
		<dc:creator>jasmine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 04:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeremyduffy.com/seminar/computer-security-module/#comment-5085</guid>
		<description>Using a File Erasure Tool Considered Suspicious
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2008/07/using_a_file_er.html

hum-bug</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using a File Erasure Tool Considered Suspicious<br />
<a href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2008/07/using_a_file_er.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2008/07/using_a_file_er.html</a></p>
<p>hum-bug</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
