Welcome
Read on to learn how to protect you and your family from scam artists, marketers, and worse.

Navigation

You are currently browsing the archives for the Big Brother category.

Search

Article Categories

Blog Categories

Blog by Month

"...because companies won't put security and privacy before profits."
 

Protecting Yourself From Suspicionless Border Searches

May 2nd, 2008

The EFF has an excellent article about how to avoid being searched at the border. Specifically, how to protect your laptop data that courts recently ruled could be searched without warrant.

Low Cost GPS Stalker Device

April 25th, 2008

Here's a guide on how to make a very low cost GPS tracking device useful for monitoring your own car, your loved ones, or anyone else for that mater so long as you can slip this device into their bag or car.

(H/T to Digg.com for the link)

Recent Ruling Upholds Border Searches of Laptops

April 23rd, 2008

You can be forced to turn it on and let border agents browse around for stuff to charge you with. Isn't that nice?

Graffiti Artist Embarasses CCTV

April 15th, 2008

It was just yesterday that I was explaining why closed circuit tv systems (the the ones they have prominently installed all over London) don't work. Here's an article about a London Graffiti artist who carefully painted a giant message to the authorities that spans three full stories on a building right next to a security camera.

The secretive graffiti artist managed to erect three storeys of scaffolding behind a security fence despite being watched by a CCTV camera.

Then, during darkness and hidden behind a sheet of polythene, he painted this comment on 'Big Brother' society.

Way to make a point.

Morons in DC Connect Camera Network of Over 5000 Cameras

April 14th, 2008

D.C. officials are giving police access to more than 5,000 closed-circuit TV cameras citywide that monitor traffic, schools and public housing — a move that will give the District one of the largest surveillance networks in the country.

(H/T to The Electronic Privacy Information Center - EPIC for the link)

Maine Given Ultimatum on REAL ID by DHS

April 3rd, 2008

Many states have defied REAL ID for privacy (but mostly money) reasons. Now it looks like things are coming to a head with the DHS warning Maine that if they don't implement REAL ID, their identification may no longer be accepted at airports.

(H/T to Privacy.org for the link)

Bush Says America Should Thank Telecoms

March 5th, 2008

If you're not aware of this already, Bush authorized the NSA to spy on Americans without a warrant (which is illegal, duh). He's managed to keep Congress from impeaching him somehow and, emboldened by his victory, he's even pushing to protect giant telecommunications companies like AT&T from the lawsuits that have sprung up against them for participating in the spying.

[Bush] Now the question is, should these lawsuits be allowed to proceed, or should any company that may have helped save American lives be thanked for performing a patriotic service; should those who stepped forward to say we’re going to help defend America have to go to the courthouse to defend themselves, or should the Congress and the President say thank you for doing your patriotic duty? I believe we ought to say thank you.

Well… I guess he has a point. Let me try:

"Thank you Telcos for helping Bush to violate our rights violently and repeatedly for years".

Wait, I don't think I did that right. Let me try again:

"Thank you Telcos for scrambling to cover your butts as much as possible and helping to shield our corrupt leadership from direct responsibility".

Dang. Maybe this time:

"Thank you for treating our privacy and personal rights as so much cow dung to be buried and stepped upon as you see fit".

You know, I don't think I can get the hang of this.

(H/T to Digg.com for the link)

People Avoiding Doctors and Insurance Companies When Getting DNA Tests

February 25th, 2008

Because of fears of data sharing, data loss, and inappropriate disclosure, people are circumventing their doctors and insurance companies when getting DNA tests. Smart people.

Can and would they use your DNA results against you? Do credit card companies raise your rates according to unrelated things on your credit report? Do insurance companies raise your rates due to traffic tickets that have little to do with telling how good or safe a driver you are?

Like I said, avoiding a record of your DNA is a smart idea.

By the way, Gattica is a great movie that describes what a future of DNA discrimination would look like.

Yet Another Reason Data Mining Should Be Controlled

February 25th, 2008

According to an Associate Press article, it's quite common for employees to snoop through customers' personal data.

Vast computer databases give curious employees the ability to look up sensitive information on people with the click of a mouse. The WE Energies database includes credit and banking information, payment histories, Social Security numbers, addresses, phone numbers, and energy usage. In some cases, it even includes income and medical information.

Experts say some companies do little to stop such abuses even though they could lead to identity theft, stalking and other privacy invasions. And companies that uncover violations can keep them quiet because in many cases it is not illegal to snoop, only to use the data for crimes.

But of course, if they didn't store all that unecessary data, this would be far less of an issue.

(H/T to The Consumerist for the link)

UK To Coerce Citizens to Accept National ID Card

February 1st, 2008

But… but… there's no way a modern government would ever do something so wrong in secret? At least we know something like that wouldn't happen in America
.

(H/T to Schneier's Blog for the link)

Mike McConnell Proving to Be No Friend to Americans

January 15th, 2008

He's working on a "Cyber-Security Policy" that would give "the government the autority to examine the content of any e-mail, file transfer or Web search".

Thanks a bunch MM.

(H/T to Slashdot for the link)

UK Loses Data on Over Half its Entire Population

November 28th, 2007

They had it, they shouldn't have, now they lost it. Same story all over.

The funniest part of this is that they're trying to convince their public that it's a good idea to have a national ID card containing even more data.

Said someone from an anti-ID card group:

"It's inevitably good news for our campaign because it proves to people that this government, and indeed any government, cannot be trusted with this amount of information. For 25 million people this is a catastrophe but it is just a small herald of the national ID scheme which would mean a potential catastrophe for 60 million of us."

RealID Dead or Dying?

November 6th, 2007

"DHS is essentially whittling Real ID down to nothing—all in the name of denying Real ID is a failure," said ACLU senior legislative counsel Tim Sparapani. "Real ID is in its death throes, and any signs of life are just last gasps."

Let's hope so.

No E-mail Privacy Rights?

November 5th, 2007

There's noise about the government trying to secure the right to read anyone's e-mails any time without any kind of warrant. Since this is still in the works and nothing concrete has happened yet, I'll wait before saying much about it. You're free to read up on the issue using that link though.

AT&T’s New Spying Program

October 31st, 2007

In an attempt to remove all doubt that AT&T is a evil-infested, garbage-brained, scum-sucking, low-life, mucus-eating sot of a company, it has been recently discovered that they built a custom algorithm to: "crunch through tens of millions of long distance phone records a night to draw up what AT&T calls "communities of interest" — i.e., calling circles that show who is talking to whom".

Privacy Analysis of the “Protect America Act”

October 16th, 2007

Cute names for bad laws aside, here's a solid report on the privacy implications of the "Protect America Act" and some recommendations on how to change it to make it acceptable.

(H/T to Schneier's Blog for the link)

UK Police Can Demand that You Decrypt Information or Jail You

October 2nd, 2007

In the UK, ever the pinnacle of freedom and privacy, you can now be forced to decrypt any data that they believe has bearing on a criminal or terror investigation. Here's the really fun part (emphasis mine):

Individuals who are believed to have the cryptographic keys necessary for such decryption will face up to 5 years in prison for failing to comply with police or military orders to hand over either the cryptographic keys, or the data in a decrypted form.

That's just peachy. So what happens if you don't know anything about it, but they think you're the guy?

Chicago to Become Camera City

September 28th, 2007

Even though cameras have been shown to be a great big boondoggle in the UK, Chicago apparently plans to repeat history.

Virtual Shield will capture, monitor, and "fully index" video from the Windy City's surveillance cameras. The software used to run the system will be able to recognize specific license plates, vehicle descriptions, and even patterns of behavior. If someone drops a briefcase on the El platform and it stays unattended for more than a minute, the system could alert the OEMC, which could then dispatch police officers to the scene.

Lovely.

Federal Agent Abuses Monitoring Systems to Track Girlfriend

September 21st, 2007

Still trust the government to not abuse their surveillance power? Read this story about a federal agent who used the Department of Homeland Security's database to stalk his ex-girlfriend and her family. When we paraniod types tell you that massive government systems can be turned against us easily, remember that though we may be loud, obnoxious, and a little nuts at times, that doesn't mean we're wrong.

(H/T to Privacy.org for the link)

Department of Homeland Security Dumps $42 Million Failed Data-Mining Project

September 7th, 2007

In what has become the norm and not the exception, an expensive Department of Defense project has been shown to be a complete failure wasting millions of dollars and all of our time. What makes this story interesting is it was due in no small part to the efforts of the Government Accountability office that this project was scrapped. They discovered that the program was using live data on American citizens instead of dummy data and that none of the required privacy protections had been put in place. Go figure.

Most frightening is this line:

The privacy office concluded that although required privacy analyses were ignored, the Privacy Act was not technically violated because the live data were covered by privacy notices issued earlier for other programs that originally gathered the information.

Which shows that the concept of taking data for one reason, but using for a completely different reason altogether is alive and well. This is the lynch-pin argument that we privacy paranoids have against data mining, store shopper cards, RFID, and any other technology that gathers our information. We know that it can be abused and that's why we try to stop it.

(H/T to Privacy.org for the link)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Other Policies | Support JeremyDuffy.com | Contact Jeremy

books

movies

Consumer Groups

Useful Tools

Best of the Web

Stop Illegal Spying

Powered by WordPress